On 04 June 2007 23:43, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > "Timothy C Prince" <tprince> writes:
[ quoting an earlier post of mine ] >> So, am I correct to believe that we need to use plain 'inline' for c99 >> after gcc 4.4, and 'extern inline' before that? That is, I think I need >> to write a test that looks like... >> >> >> #if ((__GNUC__ > 4) || ((__GNUC__ == 4) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4))) \ >> && defined (__STRICT_ANSI__) && (__STRICT_ANSI__ != 0) \ >> && defined (__STDC_VERSION__) && (__STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L) >> #define ELIDABLE_INLINE inline >> #else >> #define ELIDABLE_INLINE extern inline >> #endif > > No, you shouldn't use anything along those lines. You should check > for __GNUC_GNU_INLINE__ and __GNUC_STDC_INLINE__ as described in the > documentation. > > In fact I mentioned this in my reply to the message you quote above: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-03/msg01093.html > > Ian And I heeded your reply in the patch that eventually got applied to newlib. This test passed when I "make check"ed 4.2.0 RC2. I'll see if I can reproduce the problem. Tim, are you sure you have the patched version of stdio.h in your /usr/include, or are you trying a combined build? cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
