[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04 June 2007 23:43, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
"Timothy C Prince" <tprince> writes:
[ quoting an earlier post of mine ]
So, am I correct to believe that we need to use plain 'inline' for c99
after gcc 4.4, and 'extern inline' before that? That is, I think I need
to write a test that looks like...
#if ((__GNUC__ > 4) || ((__GNUC__ == 4) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4))) \
&& defined (__STRICT_ANSI__) && (__STRICT_ANSI__ != 0) \
&& defined (__STDC_VERSION__) && (__STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L)
#define ELIDABLE_INLINE inline
#else
#define ELIDABLE_INLINE extern inline
#endif
No, you shouldn't use anything along those lines. You should check
for __GNUC_GNU_INLINE__ and __GNUC_STDC_INLINE__ as described in the
documentation.
In fact I mentioned this in my reply to the message you quote above:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-03/msg01093.html
Ian
And I heeded your reply in the patch that eventually got applied to newlib.
This test passed when I "make check"ed 4.2.0 RC2. I'll see if I can
reproduce the problem.
Tim, are you sure you have the patched version of stdio.h in your
/usr/include, or are you trying a combined build?
I have patched stdio.h, but it may not be your latest recommendation.
The problem didn't show up in gcc-4.3 testsuite until last week.
