On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:44:28PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Joe Buck wrote: > > > So the answer is that, after consulting with some of the affected people > > (which is why you got mail, Mike) the SC told RMS that it would be > > changed. If it hasn't been done yet, then it's a release blocker, > > because it was a promise the SC made. > > Since you seem to have a handle on the outcome of the discussion, would > you please create a Bugzilla entry for this, targeted at 4.1, explaining > what it is the SC agreed to do? Otherwise, I'm certain to forget about > this issue...
It is PR 25892.
