> I see that. I'm testing the following fix to address the fortran > regressions. The observation is that the fortran FE uses structures > to pass (lots of) arguments to I/O functions, and uses array descriptors > for passing arrays, which are handled similarly. Now those structures > are only _written_ to in the caller (and have its address taken for the > call), so it's pointless to build dataflow information for those as this > will only result in really long clobber lists for the calls. > > Does this look like a sane idea?
It's fine for now, it's just going to get in the way when we actually start using the inteprocedural pta results.
