On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: > > with the patch applied it improves a little bit ;) > > I get for the list I have sent: > > snapshot 12/24 12/31 01/07 01/14 +patch > > ac 5.8s 6.0s 24.7s 23.0s + 37.9s
Hm, so that regresses even more. Weird. I'd like to have it to investigate. > air 21.0s 21.6s 8.2s 8.0s - 13.0s It looks like this actually benefitted from the additional SFTs - for some reason. Can you send me links to this (air) and the previous (ac) so I can investigate and maybe improve it further? Thanks, Richard.
