Mark Mitchell writes: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > >>My inclination is to do nothing (other than correct the target > >>milestones on these bugs in bugzilla) and move on. The Solaris problem > >>is bad, and I beat up on Benjamin to get it fixed, but I'm not sure it's > >>a crisis meriting another release cycle. The C++ change fixed a > >>regression relative to 3.4.x, but not 4.0.x. Andreas' change is only > >>known to affect m68k. > > > > ... but IIRC it cripples GCC for m68k; Debian turned up hundreds of > > build failures because of this bug and it set builds back several > > weeks. > > Was this a regression from 4.0.0 or 4.0.1?
I don't know. We noticed when we did switch the compiler from 3.3 to 4.0. IMO, we (Debian) can make sure that the patch is applied in the compiler. Matthias
