Eric Botcazou wrote: >>I've decided not to do another release. I think it's too much effort >>for too little gain. The C++ and m68k patches are things that might >>just as easily not have been applied in the first place; we certainly >>wouldn't have considered either PR a showstopper. The Solaris problem >>is unfortunate, but I think not fatal. > > > Agreed. But I'm requesting a "caveat" note about the Solaris regression here: > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0/changes.html#4.0.2 > mentioning the workaround (g++ -pthreads) and the link: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-09/msg00984.html
Roger that. I'll take care of it as soon as I can. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] (916) 791-8304
