Man, these clang fanboys sure are getting out of hand I feel like all this garbage can be easily resolved by y'all showing this idiot the exact proper options required and attaching the resulting compiled assembly exactly as he wants it, or if gcc doesn't compile the exact assembly he wants, explaining why gcc chose a different route than the quote on quote "Perfect assembly" that he expects it to spit out
And Stefan? Ever heard of the saying that "the loudest man in the room is always the weakest"?
