On 2005-06-19 11:17:47 +0100, Haren Visavadia wrote: > --- Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > > Vincent Lefevre writes: > > > > | Other solutions that would fix the bug (but not > > ultimate solutions): > > | 1) Do not claim that gcc is a conforming ISO C > > implementation. > > > > As far as I can see, there is no such claim. > > It's implied when using -std=c99
Yes, and if GCC developers think it is better to lie concerning the C standard comformance, this could be acceptable when such an option is given, but this should be clearly documented. According to the man page, this just means that the source is to be seen as C99 (what "the compiler accepts"). -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
