Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 2005-06-19 11:17:47 +0100, Haren Visavadia wrote: | > --- Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > > Vincent Lefevre writes: | > > | > > | Other solutions that would fix the bug (but not | > > ultimate solutions): | > > | 1) Do not claim that gcc is a conforming ISO C | > > implementation. | > > | > > As far as I can see, there is no such claim. | > | > It's implied when using -std=c99 | | Yes, and if GCC developers think it is better to lie concerning the | C standard comformance, this could be acceptable when such an option | is given, but this should be clearly documented. According to the man | page, this just means that the source is to be seen as C99 (what "the | compiler accepts").
Now that you have equated GCC developers to liars, are you willing to improve over the situation? -- Gaby
