Jason Bucata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You should try and isolate a single BYTEmark test which shows the >> biggest regression. It's better if you manage to pack the whole test >> as a single preprocessed source file. Theoretically, this file >> should be compilable and linkable, and the resulting binary should >> run for a while doing computations. >> >> With this kind of help, we can analyze the regression and see why >> it's slower with 4.0.0. > > It was rather time-consuming but I managed to do it. I picked the > numsort benchmark which had a serious regression: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Many, many thanks! Giovanni Bajo
