On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:52:40PM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 06:08:43PM -0500, Jason Bucata wrote:
> > Would it help to report some others [regressions]?
> > I might have time later this week to
> > work on some of the others, especially now that I have a much better idea of
> > what to look for.
>
> If you can find a small test with a large regression (say 30% or more), it
> would be great to have a PR for such a thing. All else being equal,
> smaller test cases are easier to debug, so I'd suggest starting with as
> small a test as possible that causes as large a regression as possible, if
> you have any like that.
OK, two more bugs posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21507
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21527
That's it for this batch, unless somebody wants me to chase down the other
problem noted in 21527.
I noticed some 4.0.0 regressions in SciMark noted here:
http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/gcc4/index.html
So I've thought I might try to chase down the regressions in Sparse MIPS and
LU MIPS... but that will have to wait a while while I catch up on other
things.
Jason B.
--
"My interest is in the future; I am going to spend the rest of my life
there."
-- Charles Kettering
