On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 08:47 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 04:22, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 23:40 -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: > > > Wasn't TER a temporary kludge that should be going away? > > When we have a tree combiner I would expect TER to disappear. > > Or if tree expansion were rewritten. One of the many things still on the > todo list. Actually both are probably necessary to really kill TER.
jeff