On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 08:47 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 04:22, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 23:40 -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > > Wasn't TER a temporary kludge that should be going away?
> > When we have a tree combiner I would expect TER to disappear.
> 
> Or if tree expansion were rewritten. One of the many things still on the
> todo list.
Actually both are probably necessary to really kill TER.

jeff


Reply via email to