On Wednesday 27 April 2005 19:15, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 08:47 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 04:22, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 23:40 -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: > > > > Wasn't TER a temporary kludge that should be going away? > > > > > > When we have a tree combiner I would expect TER to disappear. > > > > Or if tree expansion were rewritten.
Ambitious! :-) > Actually both are probably necessary to really kill TER. There are still a few optimizations that tree expansion now does, that should be moved to the tree optimizers. See e.g. PR14841. I don't know if we have PRs for other optimizations expr.c&friends do. Gr. Steven
