On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 03:50 +0100, Marcin Dalecki wrote: > On 2005-02-11, at 02:19, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > > Uh, why do you want the server stuff for gcc purposes? > > Just curious. Why not? If I want to try it out I want to try it out on > my own > repos too. Maybe I was just too optimistic about it. And then I simply > didn't know up front what I will get - just the client the server or > what else > ot of it. configure --help didn't tell anything about it. > > > These are java bindings, if you don't use them, don't use them. > > They are there. They have to be supported maintained and so on... they > may break things if I suddenly update something on the system... Whatever. Forget it, i'm not even going to bother responding to your message. It reads like one large troll.
- Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
- Re: Details for svn test repository Marcin Dalecki
- Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
- Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
- Re: Details for svn test reposi... Marcin Dalecki
- Re: Details for svn test repository Mike Stump
- Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
- Re: Details for svn test repository Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
- Re: Details for svn test repository Marcin Dalecki
- Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
- Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
- Re: Details for svn test repository Marcin Dalecki
- Re: Details for svn test repository Kevin Puetz
- Re: Details for svn test repository Paul Schlie
- Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
- Re: Details for svn test repository Paul Schlie
- Re: Details for svn test repository Kai Henningsen
- Re: Details for svn test repository Kevin Puetz
- Re: Details for svn test repository Lars Segerlund
- Re: Details for svn test repository Richard Earnshaw