> From: Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 22:32 -0500, Paul Schlie wrote: >> Out of curiosity, although svn certainly seems attractive, are there any >> concerns observing that: >> >> - ironically it seems that the svn isn't itself under svn control but cvs? > What? > It's been under subversion control pretty much since day 1. > Whatever gave you this idea?
- I apparently misinterpreted: http://svn.collab.net/viewcvs/svn/trunk/ as was viewing it via viewcvs (which I now understand is svn friendly) And thank for the remaining answers as well, -paul-
