Hi,
On 12/04/2014 07:17 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
So added testcase for this pr (its c++98 only)
So:
ChangeLog testsuite
2014-12-04 Kai Tietz <kti...@redhat.com>
PR c++/64127
* g++.dg/cpp/pr64127.C: New file.
Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Ok to apply prior posted patch plus this new testcase?
The testcase is now in and is spuriously failing for everybody because
in the testsuite, thus with -pedantic-errors, in one case an error
instead of a warning is emitted plus the dg- directives are
unnecessarily complicated and slightly wrong. Barring objections, I mean
to commit the below pretty soon.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/////////////////////////////
Index: g++.dg/cpp/pr64127.C
===================================================================
--- g++.dg/cpp/pr64127.C (revision 218586)
+++ g++.dg/cpp/pr64127.C (working copy)
@@ -1,9 +1,4 @@
/* { dg-do compile { target c++98_only } } */
-template <0> int __copy_streambufs_eof; // { dg-error "" }
-// { dg-error "numeric constant" "" { target *-*-* } 3 }
-// { dg-warning "variable templates" "" { target *-*-* } 3 }
-__copy_streambufs_eof < // { dg-error "" }
-// { dg-error "parse error" "" { target *-*-* } 6 }
-// { dg-error "not name a type" "" { target *-*-* } 6 }
-
+template <0> int __copy_streambufs_eof; // { dg-error "expected
identifier|numeric constant|variable templates" }
+__copy_streambufs_eof < // { dg-error "template argument|parse error|not name
a type" }