This patch is a follow-up to this one
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02337.html
which I checked in a couple months ago to fix execution failures from
trying to run ARM NEON code on a target that didn't support those
instructions. I noticed that since then, some new gcc.dg/vect tests
have been added that fail in the same way. Since it's exactly the same
problem and solution as the previous batch, I've committed the attached
patch as an obvious fix.
-Sandra
2014-12-05 Sandra Loosemore <san...@codesourcery.com>
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/vect/pr63341-1.c: Remove explicit "dg-do run".
* gcc.dg/vect/pr63341-2.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/vect/pr63379.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/vect/pr63605.c: Likewise.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr63341-1.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr63341-1.c (revision 218426)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr63341-1.c (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
/* PR tree-optimization/63341 */
-/* { dg-do run } */
#include "tree-vect.h"
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr63341-2.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr63341-2.c (revision 218426)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr63341-2.c (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
/* PR tree-optimization/63341 */
-/* { dg-do run } */
#include "tree-vect.h"
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr63379.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr63379.c (revision 218426)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr63379.c (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
/* PR tree-optimization/63379 */
-/* { dg-do run } */
#include "tree-vect.h"
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr63605.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr63605.c (revision 218426)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr63605.c (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
-/* { dg-do run } */
-
#include "tree-vect.h"
extern void abort (void);
