On Nov 18, 2014, at 3:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > No, I'm not touching tmp array at all in that case, only look at vp > individual bytes. Either they are all 0, or all 0xff, or I return NULL.
Oh, sorry, I misread where the break; in your code was going. I might have been misled by: > - gcc_assert (GET_MODE_PRECISION (outer_submode) > - <= MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT); in your patch. You don’t need that anymore, do you? If not, can you remove this part. The rest looks like normal rtl/vector code, I don’t see anything wrong with it.
