On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Yury Gribov wrote: > It looks like min_align_of_type is just too C11-specific to be usable in other > contexts. Here is a patch which does what Jakub originally proposed (use > TYPE_ALIGN_UNIT for user-aligned types, fallback to min_align_of_type > otherwise).
I think the requirements for min_align_of_type and ubsan are exactly the same, and we should not create a duplicate function for this. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
