On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 11:03:50PM -0600, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 10/01/2014 11:26 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > >+ if (check_no_cilk (cond, "in a condition for a for-loop")) > > Why is this one "in" while the others are "as"?
I think "in" was somewhere hard coded in the test suite and I wanted to minimize test suite changes. So I tried to keep the existing messages the same as before. > The patch is OK in any case. > > Please ping me directly on C++ patches. Ok. Thanks. -Andi -- a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
