On 10/01/2014 11:26 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
+ if (check_no_cilk (cond, "in a condition for a for-loop"))
Why is this one "in" while the others are "as"? The patch is OK in any case. Please ping me directly on C++ patches. Thanks, Jason
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] Add illegal cilk checks to C++ front. Jason Merrill
