On 07/10/14 08:39 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
OK, here is a patch for both using typename as a class key for template template parms and for __has_include, etc.Are these too wordy?
They look OK to me, although you say "__has_include_next and __has_include_next" in both places, the first should be just __has_include. I can make that change and commit it, thanks.
