On 18/09/14 11:01, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While browsing the code I noticed that the pattern in the patch has a
> store type when it is really a vld1 operation. Looking at the patterns
> around it, I think it was just a copy-pasto.
>
> The patch corrects that.
>
> Tested arm-none-eabi.
>
> Ok for trunk?
>
> 2014-09-18 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>
>
> * config/arm/neon.md (*movmisalign<mode>_neon_load): Change type
> to neon_load1_1reg<q>.
>
>
> arm-movmisalign-type.patch
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/neon.md b/gcc/config/arm/neon.md
> index 354a105..69b7cfa 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/arm/neon.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/arm/neon.md
> @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ (define_insn "*movmisalign<mode>_neon_load"
> UNSPEC_MISALIGNED_ACCESS))]
> "TARGET_NEON && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN && unaligned_access"
> "vld1.<V_sz_elem>\t{%q0}, %A1"
> - [(set_attr "type" "neon_store1_1reg<q>")])
> + [(set_attr "type" "neon_load1_1reg<q>")])
>
> (define_insn "vec_set<mode>_internal"
> [(set (match_operand:VD 0 "s_register_operand" "=w,w")
>
OK.
R.
