On 09/15/14 05:25, FX wrote:
Perhaps it would be safer simply to revert that hunk of the original patch
unless/until (1) and (2) above are addressed?
Given that the original patch addresses “only” a missed-optimization (and
causes ice-on-valid), it makes sense to me.
What I think we need is folks with an understanding of those systems to
chime in with the information Kai needs to fix the problem. I don't
recall seeing that, so if I missed it, feel free to point me to it.
I'd rather not start going backwards and reverting because we simply
haven't done the digging to really understand the issues on other other
ports.
jeff
