On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Bin Cheng <bin.ch...@arm.com> wrote: > Hi, > Case pr61772.c scans specific string in assembly file, and it is run for > many different option combinations. When it's tested against different lto > option combinations on targets like ARM, the generated pr61772.s may only > contain lto object content, rather than assembly codes. The scanning check > is failed in these cases. > I think disabling lto won't weaken the test since what it tests has nothing > to do with lto. This patch fixes these failures by disabling lto. > > Is it OK?
Ok. Thanks, Richard. > Thanks, > bin > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > 2014-08-07 Bin Cheng <bin.ch...@arm.com> > > * gcc.dg/torture/pr61772.c: Skip lto running.
