On 08/05/2014 08:10 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
.. a clarification. As I tried to briefly explain yesterday, this kind of change means that:extern void z(); void il() { if (z != (void*)0) z(); } doesn't trigger anymore the pedwarn at beginning of composite_pointer_type about the comparison itself, for the simple reason that we don't call it anymore.
So let's keep calling it when the RHS is also a pointer? Jason