On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> wrote: >> > Why didn't you replace the tree.c uses BTW? >> >> Patches were already quite big, but I'll add it. > > Actually I handled them all in tree.c. Did you > mean something else?
I meant transform the iterative_hash_* _implementations_ to use the interface. But maybe I missed sth in the patch(es). > I didn't convert all of tree-ssa-* and dwarf* so far, > and a few other places. This can be done step by step. Sure. Can you re-post the adjusted patch introducing inchash.[ch]? Thanks, Richard. > -Andi
