Hi,
On 06/27/2014 06:53 PM, Tim Shen wrote:
PS: sorry for being distracted by other issues: what happened to the other
regex issue? I think we are simply going to apply, when ready, your more
complete fix, right?
The problem given in the other PR (PR 61582) is also solved by this
patch (but I forgot to mention that); They are all examples like
nested range quantifiers.
Good, thanks. I'll let Jon properly reviewing the patch, he followed
your recent work more closely than me.
PR 61424's patch is ready; I was waiting for some "Ok go ahead", but
now I realize that I need to send the complete patch first :) I'll
send it later.
Yes, I meant that one, was too lazy to look it up ;) Thanks in advance,
anyway!
Paolo.
