On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:14:17AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > Perhaps not unsurprisingly, the patch is very similar. Bootstrapped > > and tested on x86_64-linux. OK for trunk? > > Ok - please give the C++/atomics folks a chance to comment. > > This change of default behavior should also be documented in > gcc-4.10/changes.html.
Do we want to allow the store data races by default with -Ofast even in strict
conformance modes (-std=c++11, -std=c++14, -std=c11)?
Jakub
