Matthew Fortune <matthew.fort...@imgtec.com> writes: > Richard Sandiford <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> writes: >> Matthew Fortune <matthew.fort...@imgtec.com> writes: >> > This is a small clean-up patch to remove code relating to reloading or >> moving >> > mips fcc registers. At some point in the past these registers were >> allocated >> > as part of register allocation but they are now statically allocated in >> the >> > backend in a round robin fashion. The code for reloading them is therefore >> not >> > necessary any more. The move costs are also irrelevant so are replaced >> with >> > a comment instead (but the cases can just be deleted if that is >> preferred). >> >> I think removing the cases would be better. >> >> OK with that change. Thanks for cleaning this up. > > Re-posting as I missed removing the ST_REGS handling code from > mips_secondary_reload_class. > > Is this still OK? Testsuite run on mips-unknown-linux-gnu shows no change > in pass/fail.
Yeah, looks good, thanks. Richard
