> This patch tries to get safe lower and upper bounds where accesses > are always guaranteed to work. The goal is not to penalize > reasonable written code: When boot-strapping the whole GCC > only a few places were found, where this new check triggers. > > Boot-strapped and regression-tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. > Additionally built a cross compiler for a stack-grows-upward-target > (xstormy16-elf). > > Ok for trunk?
No, that's far too complicated a change for such a dumb artificial testcase. I have suspended the PR. I'd suggest concentrating on bug reports for real- life software and/or new features, this would IMO be a better use of the time you devote to GCC. -- Eric Botcazou
