On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:34:28PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Richard Sandiford >> <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > Kenneth Zadeck <zad...@naturalbridge.com> writes: >> >> everyone who has a private port will hate you forever. note that i >> >> have 2 of them. >> > >> > Got any other ideas though? I suppose if we're prepared to break >> > compatibility with whatever the upstream of longlong.h is, we could >> > make more use of intN_t and uintN_t. >> > >> > Having a whitelist of hosts seems like the best fix though. >> > I'm not sure the default umul_ppmm is going to be any better >> > than not defining it. >> > >> >> Can you add a configure time check if >> >> typedef unsigned int UTItype __attribute__ ((mode (TI))); >> >> is supported? > > Why? Isn't that #ifdef __SIZEOF_INT128__ ? >
Yes, we can use that. Will it work? -- H.J.
