Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana....@googlemail.com> writes: > diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog > index 354cdb9..8ef9a0f 100644 > --- a/gcc/ChangeLog > +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog > @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ > +2014-05-08 Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com> > + > + * wide-int.cc (UTItype): Define. > + (UDWtype): Define for appropriate W_TYPE_SIZE. > + > 2014-05-08 Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> > > PR target/60737 > diff --git a/gcc/wide-int.cc b/gcc/wide-int.cc > index 69a15bc..3552e03 100644 > --- a/gcc/wide-int.cc > +++ b/gcc/wide-int.cc > @@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ typedef unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT UWtype; > typedef unsigned int UQItype __attribute__ ((mode (QI))); > typedef unsigned int USItype __attribute__ ((mode (SI))); > typedef unsigned int UDItype __attribute__ ((mode (DI))); > +typedef unsigned int UTItype __attribute__ ((mode (TI))); > +#if W_TYPE_SIZE == 32 > +# define UDWtype UDItype > +#elif W_TYPE_SIZE == 64 > +# define UDWtype UTItype > +#endif > #include "longlong.h" > #endif
OK, thanks. Technically the W_TYPE_SIZE == 32 should be dead now that HWI is always 64 bits, but there's still a debate about whether wide-int should continue using HOST_WIDE_INT/int64_t or something else, so I think it would be best to keep it. Richard
