On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Cary Coutant wrote:

> What are the rules for backporting to 4.9.1? Should I backport this patch?

As it fixes a regression, yes.  If you think it is safe to do so.

Richard.

> -cary
> 
> 
> > 2014-04-25  Cary Coutant  <ccout...@google.com>
> >
> > gcc/
> >         PR debug/60929
> >         * dwarf2out.c (should_move_die_to_comdat): A type definition
> >         can contain a subprogram definition, but don't move it to a
> >         comdat unit.
> >         (clone_as_declaration): Copy DW_AT_abstract_origin attribute.
> >         (generate_skeleton_bottom_up): Remove DW_AT_object_pointer attribute
> >         from original DIE.
> >         (clone_tree_hash): Rename to...
> >         (clone_tree_partial): ...this; change callers.  Copy
> >         DW_TAG_subprogram DIEs as declarations.
> >         (copy_decls_walk): Don't copy children of a declaration into a
> >         type unit.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/
> >         PR debug/60929
> >         * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf4-nested.C: New test case.
> >         * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf4-typedef.C: Add -fdebug-types-section 
> > flag.
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE / SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend"orffer

Reply via email to