On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:29:44PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >+ if (code == CILK_FOR)
> >+ {
> >+ top_level_body = push_stmt_list ();
> >+ top_body = begin_omp_parallel ();
> >+ }
>
> I wouldn't expect the front end to care that Cilk for is implemented
> using a parallel call; can't we bring that in at lowering time?
The gimplifier already cares, so if it shouldn't be added early in the FE,
it must be added during genericization.
Unless we treat CILK_FOR as implicit parallel in the gimplifier, but I'd say
that it is better to have it expressed as parallel with cilk_for nested in
it and the combined flag set, so that omp-low.c can then emit it together.
Jakub
