On 01/08/14 02:05, Laurent Alfonsi wrote:
Isn't the idea here that if we've already generated the function body (presumably with instrumentation) that a no-instrument attribute appearing on a later declaration won't do anything useful?All,I was looking at PR49718. I have enclosed a simple fix for this bug report. 2014-01-07 Laurent Alfonsi <laurent.alfo...@st.com> * c-family/c-common.c (handle_no_instrument_function_attribute): Allow no_instrument_function attribute in class member definition/declaration. Looking at the implementation of the function attributes, I see no reason anymore to keep this error message. Let me know if I missed something. I have also added a testcase in the enclosed patch. 2014-01-07 Laurent Alfonsi <laurent.alfo...@st.com> PR c++/49718 * g++.dg/pr49718.C: New
jeff
