On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote: > And this is the i?86 specific part of -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow, > split out of the huge patch. It really is dependent on the generic > parts, when commiting, I'll put both parts together.
Just a question (I will review the patch later today): shouldn't generic parts also work without new target patterns and use __addv* stuff from libgcc when patterns are not present? Uros.
