On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2013, at 2:05 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbg...@lug-owl.de> wrote:
>> - enum raw_str_phase { RAW_STR_PREFIX, RAW_STR, RAW_STR_SUFFIX };
>> - raw_str_phase phase = RAW_STR_PREFIX;
>> + enum raw_str_phase { RAW_STR_PREFIX, RAW_STR, RAW_STR_SUFFIX } phase =
>> RAW_STR_PREFIX;
>
> Since no one else chimed in… seems obvious to me… though the line is too
> long. Better likely would be to just say:
No it does not due to in C++ the name is injected without the enum tag too.
>
> enum raw_str_phase phase = RAW_STR_PREFIX;
This is a good work around but please add a comment of why this is
needed (to work around a bug in XLC++).
Thanks,
Andrew
