On Oct 16, 2013, at 1:11 AM, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:
> I suppose it's fine to move the testcase to the C++ lto testsuite
> if you verify it will use the C compiler for the C parts.
Thanks. Testing pointed out one additional feature lto testing need to make
thing whole thing go. Committed.
2013-10-19 Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net>
* g++.dg/lto/lto.exp: Add support for C/C++ mix language testing.
* gcc.dg/lto/pr54625-1_0.c: Move from here...
* g++.dg/lto/pr54625-1_0.c: ... to here.
* gcc.dg/lto/pr54625-1_1.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/lto/pr54625-1_1.C: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/lto/pr54625-2_0.c: Likewise.
* g++.dg/lto/pr54625-2_0.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/lto/pr54625-2_1.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/lto/pr54625-2_1.C: Likewise.
Index: g++.dg/lto/lto.exp
===================================================================
--- g++.dg/lto/lto.exp (revision 203827)
+++ g++.dg/lto/lto.exp (working copy)
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ if { ![check_effective_target_lto] } {
}
# Main loop.
-foreach src [lsort [find $srcdir/$subdir *_0.C]] {
+foreach src [lsort [find $srcdir/$subdir *_0.\[cC\]]] {
# If we're only testing specific files and this isn't one of them, skip it.
if ![runtest_file_p $runtests $src] then {
continue
