On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:06 PM, David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> wrote: > >> I was unable to build a native powerpc compiler. I checked for >> build_target_node and build_optimization_node throughout and changed >> rs6000 because it had references. I did not realize >> function_specific_save and function_specific_restore have to be >> changed. Sorry for breaking it. > > As Mike replied, gcc110 is available. Richard Biener's approval was > dependent upon successful bootstrap and passing the regression > testsuite, which you did not even attempt, nor did you try to build a > cross-compiler. You also did not contact the rs6000 maintainer (me) > nor the last person who changed the code in question (Mike).
Yes, I should have done this. > How is Google going to change its patch commit policies to ensure that > this does not happen again? Looking at our best practices document, it points to http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html and mentions the compile farm. So, this is my fault alone for not testing powerpc & mips. Sri > > Thanks, David
