On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> wrote:
> I was unable to build a native powerpc compiler. I checked for > build_target_node and build_optimization_node throughout and changed > rs6000 because it had references. I did not realize > function_specific_save and function_specific_restore have to be > changed. Sorry for breaking it. As Mike replied, gcc110 is available. Richard Biener's approval was dependent upon successful bootstrap and passing the regression testsuite, which you did not even attempt, nor did you try to build a cross-compiler. You also did not contact the rs6000 maintainer (me) nor the last person who changed the code in question (Mike). How is Google going to change its patch commit policies to ensure that this does not happen again? Thanks, David
