Hi,
On 09/04/2013 10:53 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
I am not at all sure the names I choose here are good ones. Suggestions
welcome.
For sure concat_size would not be Ok, isn't uglified. Thanks for the
code, you understand isn't really something we can imagine committing.
I also shudder at the idea of repeating _M_range_check code in
e.g. string::at(), and elsewhere. Perhaps we need a snprintf_lite, that
only understands '%zu' and literal characters, e.g.:
snprintf_lite(__s, sizeof(__s),
_N("vector::_M_range_check: __n (which is %zu) >= "
"this->size() (which is %zu)"), __n, this->size());
That seems worth exploring, I agree.
Paolo.
