On 08/24/2013 02:16 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 08/13/2013 10:57 PM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
1) The 4 files that hold the wide-int code itself. You have seen a
lot of this code before except for the infinite precision
templates. Also the classes are more C++ than C in their flavor.
In particular, the integration with trees is very tight in that an
int-cst or regular integers can be the operands of any wide-int
operation.
Are any of these conversions lossy? Maybe some of these constructors
should be made explicit?
It depends, there is nothing wrong with lossy conversions as long as you
know what you are doing.
