On 08/13/2013 10:57 PM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
1) The 4 files that hold the wide-int code itself. You have seen a
lot of this code before except for the infinite precision
templates. Also the classes are more C++ than C in their flavor.
In particular, the integration with trees is very tight in that an
int-cst or regular integers can be the operands of any wide-int
operation.
Are any of these conversions lossy? Maybe some of these constructors
should be made explicit?
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
