> > We already support the .blahblah syntax in the demangler in d_print_comp. > > (I think it deserve to be extended to special case some newly introduced > > mess, like .ltopriv and .local_alias) > > I wonder if we don't want to get the mangling here to be consistent, so > > users are facing the same type of obscurity? > > IOW you'd prefer using the period as concatenation character here? Fine with > me as well, I only care about the uniform side.
I think demangler will output BLAH.xyz as BLAH [clone xyz] > > > Otherwise the patch seems resonable to me. With LTO we will still get the > > ugly assembler names right? > > I'm afraid so, but that's a very minor caveat. Yep, i guess we will care about this later. Honza > > -- > Eric Botcazou