> > We already support the .blahblah syntax in the demangler in d_print_comp.
> > (I think it deserve to be extended to special case some newly introduced
> > mess, like .ltopriv and .local_alias)
> > I wonder if we don't want to get the mangling here to be consistent, so
> > users are facing the same type of obscurity?
> 
> IOW you'd prefer using the period as concatenation character here?  Fine with 
> me as well, I only care about the uniform side.

I think demangler will output BLAH.xyz as BLAH [clone xyz]
> 
> > Otherwise the patch seems resonable to me.   With LTO we will still get the
> > ugly assembler names right?
> 
> I'm afraid so, but that's a very minor caveat.

Yep, i guess we will care about this later.

Honza
> 
> -- 
> Eric Botcazou

Reply via email to