> We already support the .blahblah syntax in the demangler in d_print_comp. > (I think it deserve to be extended to special case some newly introduced > mess, like .ltopriv and .local_alias) > I wonder if we don't want to get the mangling here to be consistent, so > users are facing the same type of obscurity?
IOW you'd prefer using the period as concatenation character here? Fine with me as well, I only care about the uniform side. > Otherwise the patch seems resonable to me. With LTO we will still get the > ugly assembler names right? I'm afraid so, but that's a very minor caveat. -- Eric Botcazou
