On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Peter Bergner <berg...@vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Ok, updated to switch the order of the alternatives. This works...just > like the previous one. I created two versions of the TD test case to > test both alternatives and to make sure we get fmrs on the one and > no fmrs on the other. > > Peter > > > gcc/ > * builtins.def (BUILT_IN_FABSD32): New DFP ABS builtin. > (BUILT_IN_FABSD64): Likewise. > (BUILT_IN_FABSD128): Likewise. > * builtins.c (expand_builtin): Add support for new DFP ABS builtins. > (fold_builtin_1): Likewise. > * config/rs6000/dfp.md (*negtd2_fpr): Handle non-overlapping > destination > and source operands. > (*abstd2_fpr): Likewise. > (*nabstd2_fpr): Likewise. > > gcc/testsuite/ > * gcc.target/powerpc/dfp-dd-2.c: New test. > * gcc.target/powerpc/dfp-td-2.c: Likewise. > * gcc.target/powerpc/dfp-td-3.c: Likewise. The last version is okay. > And is the *negtd2_fpr hunk ok for the 4.8 branch? The negtd2_fpr change is okay for the 4.8 branch. Thanks, David
