Andrew MacLeod <amacl...@redhat.com> writes: > > What it doesn't do: > * It doesn't implement the C11 expression expansion into atomic > built-ins. ie, you can't write: > _Atomic int x; > x = 0; > and have the result be an atomic operation calling > __atomic_store (&x, 0).
How would this work if you want a different memory order? -Andi -- a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
