Hi Uros,
On 18 Jul 2013, at 07:31, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> This should be implemented as an expander. You also won't need
> UNSPEC_NLGR that way.
Now I reload the state from this PR, I recall why this did not work.
in the case:
foo ()
{
do stuff that doesn't use the pic reg
call nested function
nonlocal_label:
do stuff that uses the pic register.
}
+{
+ if (crtl->uses_pic_offset_table)
+ {
+ rtx xops[3];
crtl->uses_pic_offset_table is not set at the point that "nonlocal_label:" is
evaluated.
So, I think we have to use the define_insn_and_split, or am I still missing
something?
Thanks
Iain
